Cases 61 - 70 of 80
O'CULL v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00570
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. O'CULL
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, MARY ELLEN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BANKS v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv00144
Petitioner:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA, BRUCE PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CONNOLLY et al v. ERNST & YOUNG LLP et al
as 1:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONNOLLY
Defendant:
ERNST & YOUNG LLP, KATHRYN A. OBERLY, PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PERRY v. PEARSON
as 1:2008cv02074
Petitioner:
TONEY A. PERRY
Respondent:
EDDIE L PEARSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
KISSI v. MEAD et al
as 1:2008cv02031
Plaintiff:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER MEAD, ESTATE FOR FRED W. BENNETT, BENNETT & BAIR and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CONNOLLY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2008cv01927
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONNOLLY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, W. LEE RAWLS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PAULINE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv01788
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAULINE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT HOME-WASHINGTON and PEARSON SUNDERLAND
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PEARSON v. UNITY HEALTH CARE INC. et al
as 1:2008cv01753
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON
Defendant:
UNITY HEALTH CARE INC., ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, INCORPORATED, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PEARSON v. CAULFIELD
as 1:2008cv01691
Petitioner:
DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON
Respondent:
JOHN CAULFIELD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COOK v. PEARSON
as 1:2008cv01125
Plaintiff:
WILBUR E. COOK
Defendant:
EDDIE LEE PEARSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
