Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 73
American Electric Power Servic v. Firstenergy Service Company
as 09-1397
Intervening Petitioner: INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION COMPANY and MICHIGAN ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC
Petitioner: AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION
Intervening Respondent: FIRSTENERGY SERVICE COMPANY, PJM INTERCONNECTION, PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION and others
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Not Party - Intervenor: AMERICAN MUNICIPAL POWER-OHIO INCORPORATED and DAYTON POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
Richard Blumenthal, et al v. FERC
as 08-74439
Petitioner: RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, LISA MADIGAN and PATRICK LYNCH, Attorney General of the State of Rhode Island
Petitioner-Intervenor: AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION, COALITION OF MIDWEST TRANSMISSION CUSTOMERS, DESERET GENERATION & TRANSMISSION CO-OPERATIVE, INC. and others
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Respondent-Intervenor: DUKE ENERGY CORP., LOWER MOUNT BETHEL ENERGY, LLC, PPL BRUNNER ISLAND, LLC and others
Richard Blumenthal v. FERC
as 08-1216
Petitioner: Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General for the State of Connecticut, Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of the State of Illinois and Patrick Lynch, Attorney General of the State of Rhode Island
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner: American Public Power Association, Coalition of Midwest Transmission Customers, Deseret Generation & Transmission Co-operative, Inc. and others
Intervenor For Respondent: Duke Energy Corporation, Lower Mount Bethel Energy, LLC, PPL Brunner Island, LLC and others
Illinois Commerce Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Comm
as 08-2124
Petitioner: ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION
Intervening Petitioner: DAYTON POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Intervening Respondent: NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES, PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY and others
American Electric Power Servic v. Federal Energy Regulatory Comm
as 08-1780
Petitioner: AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Intervening Respondent: EXELON CORPORATION, AMERICAN MUNICIPAL POWER-OHIO INCORPORATED, ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
American Electric Power Servic v. FERC
as 08-1056
Petitioner: American Electric Power Service Corporation
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent: American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc., Atlantic City Electric Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company and others
Illinois Commerce Commission v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1306
Petitioner: ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION
Intervening Petitioner: AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Intervening Respondent: OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, AMERICAN MUNICIPAL POWER-OHIO INCORPORATED, PJM INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMER COALITION and others
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. PPL Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv04963
Plaintiff: Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P
Defendant: PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, PPL Gas Utilities Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Piedmont Environmental Council v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1651
Petitioner: PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
Intervenor: PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NYPSC), MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY and others
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Amicus Supporting Petitioner: STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P. v. PPL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv02313
Plaintiff: RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P.
Defendant: PPL CORPORATION, PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION, PPL GAS UTILITIES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?