Cases 61 - 70 of 496
Guillermo Beltran et al v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04927
Plaintiff:
Rudy Delao, Joshua Bolden, Guillermo Beltran and others
Defendant:
Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc., Does 1 through 20, inclusive and Enrique Hernandez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
(PC) Arocha v. Diaz
as 2:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Rudy Arocha
Defendant:
Ralph M. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudy Latscha v. Ken Clark
as 2:2022cv02688
Petitioner:
Rudy Latscha
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al.
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arocha v. Diaz
as 2:2022at00380
Plaintiff:
Rudy Arocha
Defendant:
Ralph M. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castillo v. Geisser et al
as 2:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Rudy R Castillo and Rudy R. Castillo
Defendant:
Mick Geisser, Maris Goldsborough, Gabriel Hollingshead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Castillo v. Geisser et al
as 2:2022at00344
Plaintiff:
Rudy R Castillo
Defendant:
Mick Geisser, MARIS GOLDSBOROUGH, Gabriel Hollingshead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
(PC) Jaramillo v. Burnes et al
as 1:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Rudie Anthony Jaramillo
Defendant:
Joseph Burnes, Alfonso Garcia, A. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jaramillo v. Burnes et al
as 2:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Rudie Jaramillo and Rudie Anthony Jaramillo
Defendant:
Joseph Burnes, Alfonso Garcia, A. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant:
Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
