Cases 61 - 70 of 100
(PC) Cannavan v. Newsom et al
as 1:2026cv06165
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Cannavan
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Jeff Macomber, Sgt. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Maria L. Mortato v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2026cv08671
Plaintiff:
Maria L. Mortato
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, County of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hugo Perafan, Jr. v. United States Marshall Service
as 2:2026cv08590
Plaintiff:
Hugo Perafan, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Case name not on file
as 3:2026cv08072
Plaintiff:
L.E. G.C.
Defendant:
US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Joseph B. Edlow and Director Danielle Lehman
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lares v. Yoh Services LLC et al
as 2:2026cv08570
Plaintiff:
Acacia Joi Lares
Defendant:
Yoh Services LLC, Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC and Naughty Dog LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
