Cases 61 - 70 of 1,065
Carter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03488
Plaintiff:
Richard Carter, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Howard v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority et al
as 1:2023cv01785
Plaintiff:
William Jack Howard, Sr.
Defendant:
Ohio Adult Parole Authority and Warden Jennifer Gillece Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White, Sr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03041
Plaintiff:
Donald White, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Gray
as 4:2023cv01650
Petitioner:
Aaron L. Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul v. Jackson
as 1:2023cv01562
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Paul, Sr
Defendant:
Harriet Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cazares v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02899
Plaintiff:
John Cazares, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harvey III v. Franklin, et al.
as 4:2023cv01518
Plaintiff:
Robert Harvey III
Defendant:
Mayor William Franklin, Christopher A. Taneyhill Sr., Eddie L. Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tedder et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02897
Plaintiff:
Charles Tedder, Sr. and Kristina Tedder
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miceli v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02869
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Miceli, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
