Cases 61 - 70 of 1,060
Miceli v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02869
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Miceli, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Gray
as 4:2023cv01650
Petitioner:
Aaron L. Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02690
Plaintiff:
Gerald Ronald Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cox, Sr. et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02663
Plaintiff:
Stephen Cox, Sr. and Susan Cox
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Paul v. Jackson
as 1:2023cv01562
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Paul, Sr
Defendant:
Harriet Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
First Franchise Capital Corporation v. Denn-Ohio, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
First Franchise Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Denn-Ohio, LLC, JMAD Hospitality, LLC, PTS Hospitality, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harvey III v. Franklin, et al.
as 4:2023cv01518
Plaintiff:
Robert Harvey III
Defendant:
Mayor William Franklin, Christopher A. Taneyhill Sr., Eddie L. Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hill v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02484
Plaintiff:
Donnie Hill, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown, Sr v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02470
Defendant:
Andrew Brown, Sr, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. Henry, Sr. et al
as 3:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Ryan P. Allen
Defendant:
Stephen L. Henry, Sr., Steven Petticrew and Clark County Ohio Department of Probation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
