Cases 61 - 70 of 139
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv08390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stanton v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. et al
as 2:2017cv08329
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Takeda Pharamceuticals, U.S.A., Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Regina Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Liu et al v. The Stanton Condominium Unit Owners Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06111
Defendant:
All Area Realty Services Inc., Jane Doe(S), John Doe(s) and others
Plaintiff:
Xingshuo Liu and Ying Juan Tang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Santos v. Keenan et al
as 1:2017cv00984
Plaintiff:
Francisco Santos
Defendant:
J. Keenan, D. Bourgeois, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04005
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sylvester v. East Islip Union Free School District et al
as 2:2017cv03116
Defendant:
Alise Becker-Santa, Mark Bernard, John V. Dolan and others
Plaintiff:
Rena Sylvester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Singletary v. Berryhill
as 6:2017cv06261
Plaintiff:
Mark Stanton Singletary
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Romano v. Levitt et al
as 9:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Anthony Romano
Defendant:
Doctor Weinstock , Doctor Kooi , A. Cincotta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Deleg v. Croman Real Estate, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv07762
Plaintiff:
Manuel Deleg
Defendant:
Croman Real Estate, Inc. , Croman Family Associates, LLC , 9300 REALTY MANAGEMENT INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
