Cases 61 - 70 of 102
Sullivan v. Sheriff
as 1:2014cv00244
Petitioner:
Richard Louis Sullivan
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bethel v. Clarke et al
as 3:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
Raymond V. Bethel, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke and Jim O'Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel v. O'Sullivan et al
as 3:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Raymond V. Bethel, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim O'Sullivan and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Creative Dimension Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00826
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus D. Williams
Defendant:
Creative Dimension Group, Inc., John W. Johnson, Deborah P. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Sullivan et al v. The Female Pelvic Medicine Institute of Virginia, P.C. et al
as 3:2013cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Sullivan and Robert Sullivan
Defendant:
The Female Pelvic Medicine Institute of Virginia, P.C. and Nathan Guerette
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Williams v. Creative Dimension Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00817
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus D. Williams
Defendant:
Creative Dimension Group, Inc., John Johnson, Deborah Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Kiken v. Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00157
Plaintiff:
Gregg Kiken
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. , Robert M. Lynch , Daniel E. Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Barlow v. O'Sullivan et al
as 2:2013cv00566
Plaintiff:
Christopher Barlow
Defendant:
Jim O'Sullivan and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartz v. Lewis et al
as 1:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
William J. Bartz, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Dean Lewis, William H. Ledbetter, Dixon L. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobile Container Service, Inc. v. MCS Acquisition Corp. et al
as 4:2012cv00030
Defendant:
MCS Acquisition Corp., Brian T. Sullivan and Ken Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Mobile Container Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
