Cases 61 - 70 of 3,938
THOMAS JR. v. BUMB et al
as 3:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
FRED THOMAS JR.
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE RENEE M. BUMB, MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHARON A. KING and MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH A. PASCAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv23419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SON V. LYNCH, ET AL.
as 2:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Yong Chul Son
Defendant:
Thomas G. Lynch, Andrew S. Strauss, Michael Skinder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
THOMAS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00058
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
MICHELE THOMAS
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PETRONGLO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv23328
Petitioner:
THOMAS EDWARD PETRONGLO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
DRAVES v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
THOMAS DRAVES
Respondent:
WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and NJ STATE PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
WALKER v. ZEMMAM et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WALKER
Defendant:
SARAH ZEMMAM, VELSON ISLES and TURO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
