Cases 61 - 70 of 301
Lee et al v. City of Terrell TX
as 3:2020cv03588
Plaintiff:
Metamorphosis SILC Inc and Garfield Lee, Sr
Defendant:
City of Terrell TX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Terrell et al v. Ampex Brands PH of Dallas Inc
as 3:2020cv03582
Plaintiff:
Kristen Terrell and James Foster
Defendant:
Ampex Brands PH of Dallas, Inc. and Ampex Brands PH of Dallas Inc doing business as Pizza Hut
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Woodmont Terrell LP v. Tanger Terrell LLC et al
as 3:2020cv03007
Defendant:
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc., Tanger Terrell, LLC, Tanger Factory Outlet Centers Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Woodmont Terrell, LP and Woodmont Terrell LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Terrell et al
as 3:2020cv02571
Defendant:
Terrell Trucking doing business as K & M Trucking, Kelvin Terrell and Terrell Trucking LLC doing business as K & M Trucking
Plaintiff:
Terence Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Saul
as 6:2020cv00425
Plaintiff:
Antonio Terrell Graham
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Terrell v. Anthony et al
as 9:2020cv00110
Defendant:
Armando Olivares, Brenda Vallejo, Blake Lamb and others
Plaintiff:
Sheron Gabriel Terrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Johnson et al
as 9:2020cv00106
Defendant:
Tiffany Mays, Johnny Dixon, Keith Hardaway and others
Plaintiff:
Sheron Gabriel Terrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Baker et al
as 9:2020cv00109
Defendant:
Brenda Vallejo, Yolanda Tamez, Richard Langley and others
Plaintiff:
Sheron Gabriel Terrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice et al
as 9:2020cv00108
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Oscar Mendoza, Richard Langley and others
Plaintiff:
Sheron Gabriel Terrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. O'Neil et al
as 9:2020cv00107
Defendant:
Thomas Doyle, Richard Langley, Brenda O'Neil and others
Plaintiff:
Sheron Gabriel Terrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.