Cases 61 - 70 of 603
Clervrain et al v. Madden et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandko, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Madden, Jon Husted, Dave Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United-ERMCO Joint Venture LLC v. Turner Construction Company
as 1:2021cv00685
Plaintiff:
United-ERMCO Joint Venture LLC
Defendant:
Turner Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mustin v. Guiller, et al
as 3:2021cv01987
Plaintiff:
Keith Mustin
Defendant:
Matthew Guiller, Ryan James, Melody Bianchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Turner
as 1:2021cv02088
Petitioner:
Clifford Douglas Taylor
Defendant:
Warden Neil Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05392
Plaintiff:
Robert Gavin Turner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05186
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM S. TURNER and SHERVELLA D. TURNER
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv04936
Plaintiff:
David E. Turner
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv04901
Plaintiff:
Darryl Turner
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCormick v. Turner
as 3:2021cv01743
Petitioner:
Jacob McCormick
Respondent:
Warden Neil Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Turek-Malitz v. Eastlake Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv01796
Plaintiff:
Joanne B. Turek-Malitz and Joanne Cromwell
Defendant:
Eastlake Police Department, Eastlake City Council, Officer Austin Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
