Cases 61 - 70 of 168
Aragon-Llanes v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv20216
Plaintiff:
Oscar Aragon-Llanes
Defendant:
United States of America , U.S. Bureau of Prisons and Warden, Federal Detention Center Miami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Houston v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2014cv01978
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Houston
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv01082
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL HALL
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HEAD v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv01020
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. HEAD
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
BRELAND v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv00988
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JEFFERSON BRELAND
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv00835
Petitioner:
MILTON JOSEPH TAYLOR
Respondent:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS and RAYMOND BYRD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DONELSON v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv00693
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DONELSON
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hector Soto v. USA, et al
as 14-55270
Petitioner - Appellant:
HECTOR RODRIGO SOTO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, USP Atwater, Atwater, California and IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Richard Huffman v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 13-17331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD HUFFMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNKNOWN PARTY, John and Jane Doe, SIS- VSP Tucson, D. E. GUZZMAN, Dr. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01914
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
