Cases 61 - 70 of 83
Sample v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2013cv00699
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Timothy C. Sample
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0056 Federal Employers Liability Act
Wachter v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2012cv01753
Plaintiff:
Raymond Max Wachter, Jr.
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Mujanic et al v. Hatfield et al
as 4:2012cv01569
Plaintiff:
Nisfeta Mujanic and Naim Mujanic
Defendant:
Walter Hatfield and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2011cv06106
Plaintiff:
Dale Johnson and Rhonda Johnson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Reynolds et al v. Union Pacific Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv00835
Plaintiff:
Amber G Reynolds and George E. Grimes, II
Defendant:
Union Pacific Corporation, The Prudential Life Insurance Company of America and Union Pacific Corporation Nonagreement Life Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
