Cases 61 - 70 of 116
Geographic Location Innovations LLC v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01336
Plaintiff:
Geographic Location Innovations LLC
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and UNtied Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03012
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Pritchett v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2015cv03594
Plaintiff:
Nunzi Pritchett
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manas et al v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 4:2015cv00533
Plaintiff:
Michael Manas and Felicia Manas
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carsey v. Baylor Trucking Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00539
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Carsey
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc and Baylor Trucking Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suarez v. United Parcel Services Inc.
as 5:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jesse Suarez
Defendant:
United Parcel Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Right to Reemployment of Inducted Persons
Avioniqs LLC v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 3:2015cv00400
Plaintiff:
Avioniqs LLC
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Counter_claimant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Counter_defendant:
Avioniqs LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv03287
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phillips v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2014cv03131
Plaintiff:
Deloris Phillips
Defendant:
City of Dallas , Dallas Police Department , United Parcel Service Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Phillips v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2014cv02864
Plaintiff:
Deloris Phillips
Defendant:
City of Dallas , Dallas Police Department , United Parcel Service Inc (Ohio) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
