Cases 61 - 70 of 18,231
Presley v. USA
as 2:2024cv11751
Petitioner:
Prescott Presley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JHS Michigan Store #1, Inc et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv11708
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Sukhwinder Singh and JHS Michigan Store #1, Inc Doing business as Pick A Snack
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Alward v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00663
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Matthew Keith Alward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
La Belle Distributors, Inc. v. United States Of America
as 2:2024cv11648
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
La Belle Distributors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Moore et al
as 2:2024cv11656
Defendant:
Larry H. Moore and Nancy C. Moore
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Bell v. USA
as 2:2024cv11667
Petitioner:
Devantae Bell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kress v. USA
as 1:2024cv11675
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Joshua Todd Kress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Albers #15580-040 v. United States
as 1:2024cv00649
Petitioner:
David Scott Albers #15580-040
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
United States of America v. Smith
as 4:2024cv11626
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
William Anthony Smith
Intervenor:
Intervenor Detroit Riverfront Conservancy,Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Rankin v. USA
as 2:2024cv11620
Petitioner:
John Rankin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
