Cases 61 - 70 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02335
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01772
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Castleman v. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2013cv00302
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Castleman
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Executive Office for United States Attorneys and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Demos v. United States Secretary for the Department of Defense et al
as 4:2013cv00006
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Secretary for the Department of Defense, United States Attorney General and United States Secretary of State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cano-Chairez v. Ryan et al
as 4:2012cv00670
Petitioner:
Alvaro Cano-Chairez
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Davis v. United States Attorney General
as 4:2012cv00111
Petitioner:
Thomas Levoyes Davis
Respondent:
United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Castillo-Arroyo v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2012cv00193
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Castillo-Arroyo
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Patricia M Vroom, Brett A Day and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
