Cases 61 - 70 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10283
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Gonzalez v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service
as 1:2021cv10018
Plaintiff:
Luis Brito Gonzalez
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv11934
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Lawyers for Civil Rights v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
as 1:2020cv11777
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Plaintiff:
Lawyers for Civil Rights
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Project Citizenship Inc. v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv11545
Defendant:
Acting Secretary Chad Wolf, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Project Citizenship Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
City of Boston
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv11387
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
RR STONE PRODUCTS LLC v. CUCCINELLI et al
as 1:2020cv10913
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, II and others
Plaintiff:
RR STONE PRODUCTS LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
