Cases 61 - 70 of 406
Ranft v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2020cv50457
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Devin L Schafer, Christine McClimons and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Ranft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv50413
Defendant:
Sgt. Mrs. Rodriguez, Mrs. Russell, Mrs. Heferfinger and others
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2020cv50396
Defendant:
Killmer, Lt. Rimmers, Colin S. Brinkmeier and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Allen Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Hamiton et al
as 4:2020cv04207
Plaintiff:
Sentoro Dunn
Defendant:
. Varga, . Wheats, Robert Hamiton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv05464
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, USCIS and others
Plaintiff:
Jairo Erazo Vargas and Erazo Vargas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Richardson v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2020cv04194
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Rob Jeffreys, Robert Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv05345
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Illinois Department of Corrections, Futos and others
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. Heart Haven Outreach et al
as 1:2020cv04530
Defendant:
Heart Haven Outreach, Ryan Lawrence and Leonel Venegas
Plaintiff:
Maria Vargas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wheeler v. Varga et al
as 3:2020cv50257
Defendant:
Jonathan Fecht, John Varga, Shawn Jacobs and others
Plaintiff:
Chad E. Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. Wynn et al
as 1:2020cv04072
Defendant:
Law Office of Michael A Galason, Classic Realty Group-IL, Inc., Daniel Wynn and others
Plaintiff:
Soila Contreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
