Cases 61 - 70 of 250
WARREN v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02981
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, PAUL A. TALBOT, ELAINE PURDUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARNER-JONES v. CARTER et al
as 1:2021cv02928
Plaintiff:
TARRA GARNER-JONES
Defendant:
ROB CARTER, DENNIS REAGLE, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PASSMORE v. INDIANA DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00435
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PASSMORE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, PABLO PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 1:2021cv02856
Plaintiff:
TROY L. SMITH
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC, WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, CENTURION MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TACKETT v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02809
Plaintiff:
SKYLER TACKETT
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, KIMBERLY MYERS, M.D. CARL E. KUENZLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOTON v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02677
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MOTON
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, KNIESER, LIEDTKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. NOLL et al
as 1:2021cv02637
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
NOLL, ZATECKY, PEARCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREW v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02549
Plaintiff:
DONALD ANDREW
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and MICHAEL MITCHEFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. INDIANA DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00368
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC., PABLO PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donyall White-Bey v. Wexford of Indiana LLC, et al
as 21-2744
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC and CHRIS WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
