Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hawkins v. Hopkins et al
as 2:2012cv02553
Plaintiff:
Johnny R. Hawkins
Defendant:
David A. Hopkins , Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas , Paul Simonich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Southard v. Franolich et al
as 2:2012cv02500
Plaintiff:
Travis Southard
Defendant:
Walter Franolich and Firstfleet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Essex v. Kansas Secretary of State
as 5:2012cv04046
Plaintiff:
Robyn Renee Essex
Defendant:
Kansas Secretary of State
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Benjamin D. Craig , Larry Winn, III , Frank Beer and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Kansas, State of
Amicu:
Board of County Commissioners of Johnson County, Kansas and Samuel D. Brownback
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynn v. Walters et al
as 5:2012cv03105
Plaintiff:
Patrick C. Lynn
Defendant:
(fnu) Walters, (fnu) Miller, (fnu) Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Divers v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2011cv03109
Petitioner:
Walter Spencer Divers
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Shawnee County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bishop v. Desert Mountain Transportation, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv02182
Plaintiff:
Walter A. Bishop
Defendant:
Desert Mountain Transportation, LLC and Julio C. Verdugo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Sands v. USA
as 2:2010cv02413
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Walter B. Sands
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
