Cases 61 - 70 of 388
Boyer v. Iser et al
as 8:2020cv01260
Defendant:
Case Management Richard Roderick, B. Cornachia, Warden Frank Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Boyer
Interested Party:
Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Neale v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv01219
Defendant:
Robert L. Greene, Walter Holmes, Boyd K. Rutherford and others
Plaintiff:
Kindall Neale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Wooten, III v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv01218
Plaintiff:
Edsel Wooten, III
Defendant:
Robert L Greene, Boyd K. Rutherford, Walter Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ross v. West et al
as 1:2020cv01031
Petitioner:
Carl Javon Ross
Respondent:
Warden Walter West and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rienhardt v. Hogan et al
as 8:2020cv01011
Defendant:
Lawrence J. Hogan, Jr., Boyd K. Rutherford, Walter Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
David A. Rienhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Villanueva et al v. D&JJ Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv00556
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Constanza, Walter Villanueva, Samuel V. Angulo and others
Defendant:
CR Calderon Construction Inc., Costello Construction Incorporated, Costello Construction of Maryland, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Epps v. Zeigler et al
as 1:2020cv00522
Defendant:
J. Michael Zeigler, Warden Walter West and Officer Whitington
Plaintiff:
Antoine Epps
Interested Party:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Murray v. Foxwell et al
as 8:2020cv00184
Defendant:
Chris Cavins, J. Bromley, Rita Mariner and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Turner v. ECI - Annex et al
as 8:2020cv00099
Defendant:
Warden Walter West, ECI - Annex and Secretary of D.P.S.C.S.
Plaintiff:
Deon Arnell Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jackson v. West
as 1:2019cv03663
Defendant:
Walter West
Plaintiff:
Donte Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
