Cases 61 - 70 of 206
Bonilla v. Yolo County
as 3:2019cv01785
Defendant:
Yolo County
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin County, AL v. Sackler et al
as 1:2019cv02421
Defendant:
Theresa Sackler, Mortimer D A Sackler, Rhodes Pharmaceuticals LP and others
Plaintiff:
Baldwin County, AL, Jackson County Board of Commissioners, OH, Shelby County, by and through the State's Attorney of Shelby County, IL and others
Petitioner:
Town of Swampscott, MA and Pasco County, FL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Anthony Turner v. Yolo County Court, et al
as 19-15069
Respondent / Appellee:
YOLO COUNTY COURT and PAUL RICHARDSON
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY RICHARDO TURNER
Chris Legal, Sr. v. Yolo County, et al
as 19-55035
Defendant / Appellee:
YOLO COUNTY, DOES, 1-5, ERICA VASQUEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIS RYAN LEGAL, Sr., AKA C. R. Legal, Sr., AKA Chris Legal, Sr.
Chris Legal Sr. v. Yolo County et al
as 2:2018cv09542
Plaintiff:
Chris Legal, Sr
Defendant:
Animal Services, DOES 1-5, Yolo County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDaniel v. United States et al
as 4:2018cv06785
Defendant:
Yolo County, City of Davis, City of Sacramento and others
Plaintiff:
Tanya Grace McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PS) Raheem v. Yolo County Domestic Relations
as 2:2018cv02759
Defendant:
Yolo County Domestic Relations
Plaintiff:
Olatunji Raheem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bonilla v. Yolo County
as 2:2018cv02547
Defendant:
Yolo County
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Turner v. Yolo County Court et al
as 2:2018cv02426
Respondent:
Yolo County Court and Paul Richardson
Petitioner:
Anthony R Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PS) McDaniel v. United States et al
as 2:2018cv02306
Defendant:
Sacramento, CA, Davis, CA, Yolo County and others
Plaintiff:
Tanya Grace McDaniel- VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
