Cases 61 - 70 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mares v. Stupik et al
as 2:2011cv00172
Plaintiff:
David Mares
Defendant:
Mark Stupik , Zak Winston, Timothy Bombardier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivy v. O'Connor et al
as 5:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ivy
Defendant:
John "Jack" O'Connor , Trevor Whipple and City of South Burlington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kasuba v. City of Rutland, VT et al
as 5:2010cv00289
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Kasuba
Defendant:
City of Rutland, VT, Wendy Wilton, James Simonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolen v. City of Barre, Vermont et al
as 2:2010cv00241
Plaintiff:
Wallace S. Nolen
Defendant:
City of Barre, Vermont, Thomas Lauzon, John Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. City of Rutland, VT et al
as 1:2010cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jamek Hart
Defendant:
City of Rutland, VT, Michael Nesshoever, Justin Souza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. City of Barre, Vermont et al
as 5:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
Brenda Brown
Defendant:
City of Barre, Vermont and Carol Dawes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson v. Burlington Town Center Mall et al
as 2:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
Uriel Anderson
Defendant:
Burlington Town Center Mall, Greg Enzor, City of Burlington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cimarron Insurance Exchange v. City of Stigler Hospital Authority
as 1:2009cv00286
Plaintiff:
Cimarron Insurance Exchange and Cimarron Insurance Exchange
Defendant:
City of Stigler Hospital Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McCain v. City of Burlington et al
as 2:2009cv00247
Plaintiff:
Zack McCain
Defendant:
City of Burlington, Linda Levitt, Brian Labarge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
