Cases 61 - 70 of 49,419
Spalding v. Administrative Office of the US Courts, et al
as 24-6081
Petitioner:
DAVID L. SPALDING
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE US COURTS, WARDEN GOLDEY, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
Betts (PS) v. Long
as 1:2024cv01164
Petitioner:
Terry Betts
Respondent:
Jeff Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Raymond P. Ortiz, Daniel Reichman and Torres Junior Vicente
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Kiki Lombard-Jackson
Defendant:
Sarah Lee, Mary Poppins, Martha Stewart-Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosgray v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
David William Cosgray
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Billy Massingill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Shyesha Scott
Defendant:
Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority, Daylen Rivers and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Palms
as 24-5026
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RAMAR TRAVELLE PALMS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00214
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Simmons v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00425
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Bobby Dale Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lay v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Develin Dion Ray Lay
Defendant:
Stephens County, Ken Graham and Javier Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
