Cases 61 - 70 of 112,013
PASCHAL v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
AARON PASCHAL
Defendant:
Com'r of Soc. S Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SHILTS v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
LORI ANNE SHILTS
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Butler v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00371
Petitioner:
Taurus Butler
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zellers v. Fifth 3rd Bank
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Zellers, Jr
Defendant:
Fifth 3rd Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. South Bend Parole District #8 et al
as 3:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Frederick James Burton
Defendant:
South Bend Parole District #8, Redding and Ludy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. Collins et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Ryan Wayne Fox
Defendant:
Cathy Collins, Candace Johnston, Caleb Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERBERT v. SKINNER et al
as 1:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Chance Herbert
Defendant:
TONY SKINNER, OFFICER FOX, OFFICER KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUTTON v. PRETORIOUS et al
as 1:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SUTTON
Defendant:
PATRICIA PRETORIOUS, CUSTODY WORKER THAT FOUND ME FACE DOWN and CENTURION MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDEN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R. HARDEN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
