Cases 61 - 70 of 6,736
Lillacalenia v. The City of Louisville Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
The City of Louisville Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Lillacalenia v. State of Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Lillacalenia v. City of Louisville
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
City of Louisville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Doe v. Taylor et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Reagan Taylor, Jailer Steve Tussey, Unknown Deputy Jailers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warick v. Newsome et al
as 7:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Gary Warick
Defendant:
Dusty Newsome, Mr. Symshack, John Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Terrence Walker and Amber Bishop
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, City of Harrodsburg, Kentucky and J.D. Pal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
