Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Rhode Island
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,151
Gomes v. USP Allenwood PA et al
as 1:2023cv00074
Petitioner: James Gomes
Respondent: USP Allenwood PA and Houston House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Palmer v. Duffy et al
as 1:2023cv00009
Plaintiff: Tyrelle Palmer
Defendant: Walter Duffy, Anzoumana Bamba, Ryan Legare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment
Snell v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2023cv00030
Plaintiff: Curley Snell
Defendant: Patricia A. Coyne-Fague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gershkoff v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2023cv00002
Petitioner: Matthew C. Gershkoff
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00428
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Gomez v. Nessinger
as 1:2022cv00437
Petitioner: Duane Curtis Gomez
Respondent: Michael Nessinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Monroe v. USA
as 1:2023cv00003
Petitioner: Jordan Monroe
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hansen v. USA
as 1:2022cv00411
Petitioner: Scott Kelly Hansen
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bedford-Beaulieu v. State of Rhode Island We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00359
Petitioner: Normand Bedford-Beaulieu
Respondent: State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Isom v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2022cv00374
Petitioner: Reginald Isom and Reginald A. Eisom
Respondent: State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?