Civil Rights Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 61 - 70 of 10,835
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00279
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Dacha v. Moody, et al
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff: Phoebe Dacha
Defendant: Shelby Moody, Emory Sydney, Paris Veillard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hodges v. Henrico County Risk Management et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff: Michael P. Hodges
Defendant: Henrico County Risk Management and Bradley Randall Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00622
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Hensley et al v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: Robert Hensley and Robin Hensley
Defendant: Wellpath, LLC, Sarah Eves, P.A., Christopher Adkins, R.N. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00007
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00117
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hoballah v. Beason
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff: Youssef Hoballah
Defendant: Christopher Beason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00587
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?