Cases 71 - 80 of 970
HARRIS v. FORRESTER-TROUPE et al
as 3:2023cv10297
Plaintiff:
LUIS MUNUZURI HARRIS
Defendant:
KENA FORRESTER-TROUPE, LUIS LOPEZ-RIVERA, KRISTAL AKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. LOVE et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MEGAN MCKENZIE and CASEY TIDWELL BARREN
Defendant:
ERIC LOVE, RON DESANTIS, NEAL DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Puccio v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.
as 1:2023cv21696
Plaintiff:
Amy Puccio
Defendant:
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HUNTER, SR. v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2023cv21546
Plaintiff:
JASON HUNTER, SR.
Defendant:
AMY HICKS, MELODY STOVER, DR. ANNETTE LUJAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wood v. Boncher
as 0:2023cv60755
Plaintiff:
Dale Scott Wood
Defendant:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HAYES MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC v. EICHELBERG et al
as 0:2023cv60748
Plaintiff:
HAYES MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company
Defendant:
AMY EICHELBERG, ALLISON PATIERNO, SCOTT SIMON and others
Solomon v. Connors et al
as 0:2023cv60673
Plaintiff:
Curtis Solomon
Defendant:
Michael Connors, Sgt. Michael Florenco, Robert Macarski and others
Moyle v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv22094
Plaintiff:
Amy Moyle
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gallagher v. Apotex Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv21255
Plaintiff:
Amy Gallagher
Defendant:
Apotex Corporation, Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
