Cases 71 - 80 of 97
Harris v. Green et al
as 8:2014cv02843
Plaintiff:
Pierce Harris
Defendant:
Robert Green, Aurthur Wallenstein, Linda Wingo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2014cv02783
Plaintiff:
Pierce Harris
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Emperatric Paulino, Rockville Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 8:2014cv02784
Plaintiff:
Pierce Harris
Defendant:
Department of Health & Human Services, Uma S. Ahluwalia, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
as 8:2014cv02363
Plaintiff:
Carolyn E. Pierce
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Pierce v. USA - 2255
as 1:2013cv00744
Petitioner:
Gary M. Pierce
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Moore et al v. Svehlak et al
as 1:2012cv02727
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Moore and Felicia W. Moore
Defendant:
Robert S. Svehlak , Neil D. Roseman , Beverly J. Svehlak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shanahan et al v. Arilotta
as 1:2012cv02104
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Shanahan , Charles M. Holub , James P. McNelis and others
Defendant:
Albert Arilotta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Harris v. Green et al
as 8:2012cv00434
Plaintiff:
Pierce Alan Harris
Defendant:
Robert L. Green, Susy K. Malagari, Arthur Wallenstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
