Cases 71 - 80 of 218
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallimort v. Hanebeck et al
as 2:2015cv00348
Defendant:
Parole Commissioner T. Bass, Parole Commissioner C. Bisbee, Parole Commissioner Tony Corda and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Gallimort
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mizzoni v. Atwood et al
as 3:2015cv00103
Defendant:
Atwood, Matt Bauman, Berley and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Mizzoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rimer v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2015cv00105
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Board of Parole Commissioners, Carson, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Rimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westman v. Nevada Board of Parole Commissioners et al
as 3:2015cv00062
Defendant:
Tony Corda, Adam Endel, Susan Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
John B Westman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tripp v. Bisbee et al
as 3:2015cv00030
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Tony Corda, Adam Endel and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Bellanger et al
as 3:2014cv00684
Defendant:
Kelly Bellanger, Greg Cox, Robert LeGrand and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Erler v. Connie Bisbee, et al
as 14-16981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ERLER
Defendant - Appellee:
CONNIE BISBEE, MICHAEL KEELER, MAURICE SILVA and others
Joseph Mizzoni v. E. McDaniel, et al
as 14-16615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH L. MIZZONI
Defendant - Appellee:
E. K. MCDANIEL, RONALD BRYANT and ADAM ENDEL
Donald McCune v. Nevada Board of Parole, et al
as 14-16409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD RAY MCCUNE
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA BOARD OF PAROLE, MICHAEL KEELER, MAURICE SILVA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
