Cases 71 - 80 of 223
BUONICONTI v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv03787
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BUONICONTI
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA, OSBORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WILDE v. GOODMAN
as 5:2015cv01034
Plaintiff:
MARTIN A. WILDE
Defendant:
ALLAN L. GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MONTEREY BAY MILITARY HOUSING, LLC et al v. PINNACLE MONTEREY LLC et al
as 2:2015mc00034
Plaintiff:
MONTEREY BAY MILITARY HOUSING, LLC, CLARK PINNACLE MONTERY BAY, LLC, CLARK MONTEREY PRESIDIO, LLC and others
Defendant:
PINNACLE MONTEREY LLC , PINNACLE IRWIN LLC , AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES CALIFORNIA INC. and others
Respondent:
BALFOUR BEATTY COMMUNITIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Type:
Other Statutes
MATTHEWS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE MATTHEWS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CORIZON HEALTH, INC. , JUANITA GOODMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODMAN et al v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. et al
as 2:2014cv05369
Plaintiff:
RHONDA GOODMAN and SCOTT P. GOODMAN
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunlap v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv01478
Plaintiff:
Joshua E Dunlap
Defendant:
Richard Smith, Tom Toolan, Holly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Kerestes et al
as 1:2014cv01319
Petitioner:
Edward Goodman
Respondent:
John Kerestes, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOODMAN v. HHGREGG, INC.
as 2:2014cv03670
Plaintiff:
KEVIN GOODMAN
Defendant:
HHGREGG, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOODMAN v. LOAD KING MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
as 2:2014cv01958
Plaintiff:
ANDRE GOODMAN
Defendant:
LOAD KING MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
