Cases 71 - 80 of 83
Berryhill v. Henry et al
as 6:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Jari Askins, Drew Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2009cv00500
Plaintiff:
Sheri Jenkins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jenkins v. PRC, LLC et al
as 6:2009cv00489
Plaintiff:
Felicia Jenkins
Defendant:
PRC, LLC and David Burkham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jenkins v. Miller
as 4:2009cv00730
Petitioner:
Brandon Lamont Jenkins
Respondent:
David Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Childers v. Muskogee, City of et al
as 6:2009cv00410
Plaintiff:
Gary Childers
Defendant:
Muskogee, City of, Rex Eskridge, Rex Eskridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jenkins v. Miller
as 5:2009cv01071
Petitioner:
Brandon Lamont Jenkins
Respondent:
David Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gold-Quest International et al
as 4:2009mc00014
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Defendant:
Gold-Quest International, David M Greene, John Jenkins and others
Jenkins v. Parker
as 5:2009cv00384
Petitioner:
James Carson Jenkins
Respondent:
David Parker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Myles et al v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2008cv00760
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Myles and Nancy Janet Myles
Defendant:
Kenneth M Jenkins and AHS Management Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
