Cases 71 - 80 of 2,307
Rundell v. MGM Resorts International
as 2:2023cv01698
Plaintiff:
Ronald G. Rundell
Defendant:
MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL
Interested Party:
John Smallman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wilkeson v. Santillan
as 2:2023cv01591
Plaintiff:
John Wilkeson
Defendant:
Raul Lakandula Santillan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hood v. Friel et al
as 3:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Perry A. Hood
Defendant:
John J. Friel, Jr., John S. Pecult and Chris Arabia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dominguez v. Benson et al
as 3:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Demian Dominguez
Defendant:
Dr. Benson, John Keast, Megan Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz-Castro v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv01508
Petitioner:
Christopher John Diaz-Castro
Respondent:
Brian Williams and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warren v. Walker John & Debra Trust et al
as 2:2023cv01504
Plaintiff:
Allanna Warren
Defendant:
Walker John & Debra Trust, Berhan Ahmen, Progress Residential Borrower 8 L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01453
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc. v. Doe
as 2:2023ms00064
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe
Okhandiar et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv01409
Plaintiff:
Krishna Okhandiar and Remilia Corporation LLC
Defendant:
Henry Smith, Maxwell Roux and John Duff, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
