Cases 71 - 80 of 1,609
Knight v. Carter et al
as 7:2022cv00037
Petitioner:
Reed Max Knight
Respondent:
Karen Carter and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cattage v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
Jeremy Cattage
Respondent:
State of Alabama and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Southard v. Warden Givens et al
as 5:2021cv01684
Petitioner:
Kenny Southard
Respondent:
Warden Givens and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv01678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Weaver v. Langham et al
as 1:2021cv01605
Petitioner:
Stephen Lewis Weaver
Respondent:
Sharon Langham and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hopson v. State of Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv01594
Petitioner:
Dale Lynn Hopson
Respondent:
State of Alabama, Attorney General State of Alabama and Warden III Joseph H. Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hutchinson v. Carter et al
as 2:2021cv01635
Petitioner:
Jibrail Hutchinson
Respondent:
Karen Carter and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cofield v. Toney et al
as 1:2021cv01603
Petitioner:
Tammy Roy Cofield
Respondent:
Deborah Toney and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baise v. Toney et al
as 4:2021cv01402
Petitioner:
Robert Baise, Jr.
Respondent:
Deborah Toney and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Avila v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2021cv01449
Plaintiff:
Mario Avila
Defendant:
State of Alabama, James H. Anderson and Alabama Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
