Cases 71 - 80 of 685
Longmuir v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Debra L. Longmuir
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Keretzer v. Saul
as 2:2021cv01659
Plaintiff:
Robert Keretzer
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Openchowski v. Saul
as 2:2021cv01566
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Mark C Openchowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
CJ NYC Inc. et al v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2021cv02388
Plaintiff:
TFS NY Inc. d/b/a Sugar Daddy's Gentlemen's Club, CJ NYC Inc. d/b/a NYC Gentlemen's Club, PRP Restaurant d/b/a Gallagher's 2000 and others
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo and The State Liquor Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harris v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01406
Defendant:
Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General Letitia James, Department of Correction and Community Supervision and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Saul
as 1:2021cv02313
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Barbara Williams
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Seta v. Saul
as 1:2021cv01249
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Michael Seta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cudak v. Saul
as 2:2021cv01250
Plaintiff:
Donald Cudak
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Anderson v. Saul
as 1:2021cv01952
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Denise Anderson
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
