Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 71 - 80 of 117
Carter v. Cox et al
as 1:2015cv01257
Plaintiff: Anton Carter
Defendant: Cox, Tangman, Pontiac Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aseves v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv03330
Plaintiff: Anton Aseves
Defendant: Chicago Police Department and Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Ghosh et al
as 1:2015cv02981
Plaintiff: Lance Norris
Defendant: Parathasarathi Ghosh, Imhotep Carter, LaTanya Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Cox et al
as 1:2015cv02184
Plaintiff: Anton Carter
Defendant: Cox, Tangman, Pontiac Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karim v. Ghosh et al
as 1:2015cv00408
Plaintiff: Samuel Karim
Defendant: Parthasarith Ghosh, Saleh Obaisi, Arthur Funk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00171
Plaintiff: Anton Walker
Defendant: Cook County Dept. of Corrections, Thomas J. Dart and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robles v. Wexford Health Sources Inc.
as 3:2014cv03369
Petitioner: Anton Robles
Respondent: Wexford Health Sources Inc
Defendant: Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robles v. Wexford Health Sources Inc.
as 1:2014cv08760
Plaintiff: Anton Robles
Defendant: Wexford Health Sources Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Northcross et al v. Bruehl We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00959
Plaintiff: Demetrius Northcross , Willie Brisco and Anton Liston
Defendant: Jack Bruehl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crowell et al v. City of Chicago et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00565
Plaintiff: Kenneth L Crowell and Bernice Arnold-Branch
Defendant: City Of Chicago , Donald Branch and Anton White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?