Cases 71 - 80 of 167
SHERRY et al v. BRITAX CHILD SAFETY, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv07979
Defendant:
BRITAX CHILD SAFETY, INC. , RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT, INC. , BOB GEAR BY BRITAX and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON SHERRY and BEAU SHERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LASANE v. CAMPOS et al
as 3:2017cv06316
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LASANE
Defendant:
ANTONIO CAMPOS, TIMOTHY MAINES, DAVID HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC. v. SHREE KRISHINA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv04588
Plaintiff:
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
SHREE KRISHINA, INC. and BOB PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESPINAL v. BOB'S DISCOUNT FURNITURE, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02854
Plaintiff:
OMAR A. ESPINAL
Defendant:
BOB'S DISCOUNT FURNITURE, LLC, XPO LOGISTICS, INC. and JANE AND JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DILLON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2017cv01993
Plaintiff:
ALAN S. DILLON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY , BOB MARTIN , DAN KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WATKINS v. CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv00284
Plaintiff:
SHAQUANNA WATKINS
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILBERTO RUIZ, ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHEATHAM v. JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2016cv08824
Plaintiff:
TERELL CHEATHAM
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT , CITY OF JERSEY CITY , ANDREW J. BARELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
