Cases 71 - 77 of 77
BROWN et al v. INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
as 2:2008cv04260
Plaintiff:
JAMES CALVIN BROWN, EDWARD A. ABRAHAM, FREDERICK W. BENDER and others
Defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
BOWEN-ELLIS v. DEMARCO
as 2:2007cv05104
Petitioner:
CONRADO EDUARDO BOWEN-ELLIS
Respondent:
DAVID DEMARCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VANDEGRIFT v. BOWEN et al
as 1:2007cv02623
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER M. VANDEGRIFT
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. BOWEN, THE CITY OF MARGATE and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOWEN et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv01025
Plaintiff:
DEEDRA BOWEN and GUY BOWEN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., JOHN DOES I-X and ABC CORP I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
BOWENS v. CITY OF TRENTON et al
as 3:2007cv00637
Plaintiff:
CLARK BOWENS
Defendant:
CITY OF TRENTON, TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, RYAN WOODHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SECHTIN v. REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2006cv00135
Plaintiff:
MARIA L FRYE, ARLENE SECHTIN, CINDY SCIUVA and others
In Re:
HUMAN TISSUE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified:
CANDY L. JONES, CYNTHIA A. LOWERY, MAX G. LOWERY and others
Defendant:
REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES, LTD., BLOOD and TISSUE CENTER OF CENTRAL TEXAS and others
Cross Defendant:
PHV J. STEPHEN BENNETT, PHV KELLY S. WITTE, PHV THOMAS G. STAYTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MERCK & CO. INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION IN RE: MDL1658
as 2:2005cv02367
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK & CO., INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME HABER, JEROME HABER, JEROME HABER and others
Movant:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI and PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
