Cases 71 - 80 of 518
STULLER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv06404
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STULLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaiser v. Tiggs Canteen Services
as 1:2021cv00131
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Kaiser
Defendant:
Tiggs Canteen Services and Barbara McAllister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TEDESCO et al v. CIRCLE K et al
as 1:2021cv00626
Plaintiff:
Cross-Tedesco Tedesco, Theodore J Tedesco, THEODORE J. TEDESCO and others
Defendant:
Circle K, Shell Oil Company, Mac's Convenience Stores d/b/a Circle K and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZUELLY v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF INDIANA, LLC
as 3:2021cv00035
Plaintiff:
Barbara Zuelly
Defendant:
FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF INDIANA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORMIGLIO et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00396
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INC, COOK INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA D FORMIGLIO, ASHLEY NAZARIAN and BARBARA D. FORMIGLIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv00099
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, SAMUEL BYRD, MARY CHAVEZ and others
Plaintiff:
MARC COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RADFORD v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv06342
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA C. RADFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOYD et al v. COMENITY BANK
as 1:2021cv00323
Defendant:
COMENITY BANK
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY BOYD and BARBARA BOYD
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
BROWN v. BLANCKENSEE et al
as 2:2021cv00076
Defendant:
BARBARA BLANCKENSEE and T. J. WATSON
Plaintiff:
BRIAN L. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HALL v. BYRD et al
as 2:2020cv00683
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, AMY WRIGHT, BARBARA RIGGS and others
Plaintiff:
PREVIS HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
