Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 732
GARNER v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2018cv00088
Plaintiff: THOMAS GARNER
Defendant: HOMER BRYSON , WALTER BERRY , GREGORY DOZIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clayton v. Bobbitt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv00025
Plaintiff: Earnest Clayton
Defendant: Trezonza Bobbitt, Harold Caravillio, Harold Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CULBREATH v. Reeves et al
as 4:2018cv00038
Plaintiff: JOHNNIE CULBREATH
Defendant: ROBERT S REEVES, KATHY S PALMER, JOY H CONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. The State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00770
Plaintiff: Segral Seville Watkins
Defendant: The State Board of Pardons and Paroles, James W. Mills, Braxton T. Cotton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00152
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2017cv01772
Plaintiff: Brian Owen Jenkins
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jenkins v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv05986
Plaintiff: Brian Owen Jenkins
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, GA DOC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-15115
Movant - Appellant: WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee: BRIAN OWENS
: SERVICE
SMITH v. DEAL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00425
Plaintiff: H T SMITH
Defendant: NATHAN DEAL, BRIAN OWENS and CEDRIC TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pugh v. Elmore et al
as 1:2017cv04269
Plaintiff: Anthony G. Pugh
Defendant: Ann Elmore, John Lloyd, James Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?