Cases 71 - 80 of 482
Chardez Harrison v. Dan Cromwell
as 22-3026
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARDEZ HARRISON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN CROMWELL
Spade v. Bolduan et al
as 1:2022cv01324
Plaintiff:
Lazarick Spade
Defendant:
CO Bolduan, Capt Keller, Dan Cromwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre Thornton v. Dan Cromwell
as 22-2974
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDRE L. THORNTON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN CROMWELL
John Whyde, Jr. v. Paul Sigsworth, et al
as 22-3916
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN WHYDE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL A SIGSWORTH, sued in his individual capacity and official capacity as Sheriff of Erie County, Ohio, ERIE COUNTY, OH, sued through the Erie County Board of Commissioners who are named only in their official capacities, ERIE COUNTY GENERAL HEALTH DISTRICT BOARD OF HEALTH, sued in its official capacity and others
Loren Leiser v. Dan Cromwell
as 22-2924
Petitioner / Appellant:
LOREN L. LEISER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN CROMWELL
The Cromwell Group, Inc. v. Fusion Radio, LLC
as 3:2022cv00864
Plaintiff:
The Cromwell Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Fusion Radio, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Gogin v. Cromwell
as 2:2022cv01264
Petitioner:
Greg Gogin
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stallings v. Cromwell
as 2:2022cv01216
Petitioner:
Tyrone Stallings
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Cromwell
as 2:2022cv01001
Petitioner:
Chardez Harrison
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Cromwell et al
as 2:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
LaMondre Moore
Defendant:
Warden Daniel Cromwell, Security Director John Congdon, Captain Chad Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
