Cases 71 - 80 of 3,646
Dobson #287619 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05874
Defendant:
Unknown Stewart, David Shinn, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bearup v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05828
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wade Bearup and Patrick W Bearup
Defendant:
Rodney Carr, Sharon Kary, Jessica Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Russell et al
as 2:2019cv05842
Defendant:
Mesa Police Department, Arizona Department of Trasnportation, Scottsdale Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Demoore T Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen #133930 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05780
Petitioner:
Keith Edward Allen
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Defendant:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Billups #156407 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05771
Respondent:
David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Jordan Donald Billups
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lynn #178201 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv05759
Defendant:
Unknown Piller, Unknown Ware, Unknown Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Asia Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera #239996 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05742
Defendant:
Unknown Lemus, Tara Diaz, G W Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis #311282 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05729
Plaintiff:
Cory Everett Lewis
Defendant:
Unknown Scott, Rio Salado, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill #276083 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05713
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan, William G Montgomery and others
Petitioner:
Jamal Jabarr Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05634
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
