Cases 71 - 80 of 122
Pargeon v. Allen County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Pargeon
Defendant:
Allen County Jail, Sheriff Gladieux and Commander Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Allen County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00430
Plaintiff:
David Jason Taylor
Defendant:
Allen County Jail, Commander Cook, Lt Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Allen County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00411
Plaintiff:
David Jason Taylor
Defendant:
Allen County Jail, Sheriff Gladieux and Commander Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRUELOVE v. COMMANDER
as 4:2016cv00168
Respondent:
COMMANDER and FLOYD COUNTY JAIL
Petitioner:
DOMINIC TRUELOVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEDFORD v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2016cv01830
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER BEDFORD
Respondent:
COMMANDER, MARION COUNTY JAIL II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Elkhart County
as 3:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
James O Young
Defendant:
Elkhart County , Bradley D Rogers , Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAFFER et al v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 2:2016cv00087
Defendant:
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, JOSHUA JONES, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and others
Plaintiff:
T. S. and MARGARET SHAFFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
SHECKLES v. COMMANDER
as 4:2016cv00002
Respondent:
COMMANDER
Petitioner:
JEROME SHECKLES
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JUSTICE, SR. v. LIEBEL et al
as 1:2015cv01776
Defendant:
JERRY HUSTON, JAIL COMMANDER, DAVID LIEBEL and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. JUSTISE, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
