Cases 71 - 80 of 432
CURRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07630
Plaintiff:
LARRY LAWRENCE CURRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CURRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07267
Plaintiff:
ALICCIA CURRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dohm v. Curry et al
as 3:2022cv00597
Petitioner:
Stephen D. Dohm
Respondent:
Mrs. Curry and Det. Mathews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Honaker v. Tremble et al
as 3:2022cv00589
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Honaker, Jennifer Lynne Honaker and Jennifer Currie
Defendant:
Officer Tremble, Sheriff Mike Williams, City of Jacksonville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CURRY v. GAY et al
as 5:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE CURRY
Defendant:
ROBERT GAY and JASON PURDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Curry et al
as 3:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah James David Pre Johnson
Defendant:
Lenny Curry, J. Lawton and Adams Towing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CURRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05909
Plaintiff:
CURTIS CURRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Curry v. USP Coleman et al
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
USP Coleman, Medical and FNU Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOHM v. CURRY et al
as 4:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN D DOHM
Defendant:
CURRY and MATHEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuce v. Curry et al
as 3:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Fuce, Sr.
Defendant:
Lenny Curry, Sheriff Mike Willams, Armor Correctional Health Care, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
