Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 80
MELTON v. GUITAR CENTER, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv02002
Plaintiff: RUSSELL D. MELTON
Defendant: GUITAR CENTER, INC., YAMAHA CORPORATION OF AMERICA, FENDER MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Conner v. Cruse et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv04650
Plaintiff: Scott Eric Conner
Defendant: K. R. Cruse, D. Melton, B. Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Theopric Bloodsaw v. Francisco Jacquez
as 08-74926
Petitioner: THEOPRIC KENT BLOODSAW
Respondent: D. MELTON, FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, R. K. BELL and others
Bloodsaw v. Bell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv04839
Plaintiff: Theopric K. Bloodsaw
Defendant: R. K. Bell, S. Roberts and D Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bloodsaw v. Bell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv03622
Plaintiff: Theopric K. Bloodsaw
Defendant: R. K. Bell, S. Roberts and D. Melton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bloodsaw v. Woodford et al
as 5:2008cv00742
Plaintiff: Theopric K. Bloodsaw
Defendant: J. S. Woodford, M. Foss, S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Theopric v. Woodford et al
as 5:2008cv00649
Plaintiff: Bloodsaw Theopric
Defendant: J. S. Woodford, R. K. Bell, S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melton
as 3:2007mc00074
MELTON v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2007cv70812
Plaintiff: ROBERT D MELTON
Defendant: A C & S INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Melton v. Hudiburg Auto Group Inc et al
as 5:2007cv00080
Plaintiff: Mika D Melton
Defendant: Hudiburg Auto Group Inc, Hudiburg Auto Group Inc, Hudiburg Chevrolet Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Type: Labor Labor: Other

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?