Cases 71 - 80 of 279
PENNINGER v. MERSHON et al
as 1:2023cv01291
Plaintiff:
JASON D. PENNINGER
Defendant:
JOHN MERSHON, CENTURION HEALTH, BRITTANY WILDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01258
Plaintiff:
DANNY LEROY JOHNSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAYJOR CONYERS, BRIAN MARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
EDDRELL SCOTT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, ARAMARK SUPERVISOR and ARAMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. OWENS
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR. and SCOTT CALLAHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, M. BRYANT, C. CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, C. CONYERS, SIMONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, M. BRYANT, D. ALSIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, M. BRYANT, C. CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR (NAME UNKNOWN), M. BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, C. CONYERS, M. BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
