Cases 71 - 80 of 140
Moore v. Caskey et al
as 1:2009cv00280
Petitioner:
David Moore
Respondent:
Dale Caskey and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winding v. Caskey et al
as 4:2009cv00157
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Bart Grimes, E. L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Caskey et al
as 4:2009cv00152
Plaintiff:
David Moore
Defendant:
Dale Caskey and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mock v. Grimes et al
as 4:2009cv00149
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Mock
Defendant:
Bart Grimes, Unknown Newbaker and Dale Caskey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Caskey et al
as 4:2009cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jethro Wallace
Defendant:
Dale Caskey and State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tarvin v. Caskey et al
as 2:2009cv00222
Plaintiff:
Michael Tarvin
Defendant:
Dale Caskey and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Epps et al
as 4:2009cv00120
Petitioner:
Stephen Harris
Respondent:
Christopher Epps, Dale Caskey and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Washington v. Mississippi Department, et al
as 09-60799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, MAJOR MOREY and others
Winding v. Thaggard et al
as 4:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Lee Thaggard, R. Gillespie, Dale Caskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. Reese et al
as 4:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
Mushun Deontrany McDowell
Defendant:
Unknown Reese, Dale Caskey and Christopher B. Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
