Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Steele Mobile Home Investments, LLC v. Hoang et al
as 2:2008cv01252
Plaintiff:
Steele Mobile Home Investments, LLC and Steele Mobile Home Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Dianna K Hoang, Dianna K Hoang and Diamond Convenience Store, Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Holyfield v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 3:2008cv00834
Plaintiff:
Diamond Holyfield
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Layher, Inc. v. Diamond Scaffold Services, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2008mc00004
Plaintiff:
Layher, Inc.
Defendant:
Diamond Scaffold Services, L.L.C. and Jewell W. Sumrall
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Harrington et al v. Starnes et al(MAG+)
as 2:2007cv00822
Plaintiff:
Walter Harrington and Nancy Harrington
Defendant:
James Starnes, Diamond, Hasser, Frost & Luckie and Spring Hill Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
