Cases 71 - 80 of 161
Dukes v. Eagleton
as 0:2016cv03190
Petitioner:
Michael A Dukes
Respondent:
Willie L Eagleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2016cv02934
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Matthews, Sr
Defendant:
3M Company , Bayer Cropscience Inc , CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Sled Agency, S.C. et al
as 3:2016cv01912
Plaintiff:
Joseph E Allen
Defendant:
Sled Agency, S.C., Lexington County Sheriff's Department, Sowards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 0:2016cv00840
Petitioner:
Michael A Dukes
Respondent:
Willie L Eagleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Duke Energy Progress LLC v. BWB Maintenance Services Company LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00679
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Progress LLC
Defendant:
BWB Maintenance Services Company LLC , Bartlett Holdings Inc , Power Equipment Maintenance Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duke v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2016cv00605
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Plaintiff:
Bernandine Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davy et al v. Duke Energy of The Carolinas LLC et al
as 7:2015cv04927
Plaintiff:
Frederick Charles Davy and Sharon Lee Davy
Defendant:
Duke Energy of The Carolinas LLC , Energy Conservation Solutions Inc , GreenSky Trade Credit LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. Duke Corporation Short Term Disability Plan
as 6:2015cv04503
Plaintiff:
Diane Perry
Defendant:
Duke Corporation Short Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Perry v. Duke Corporation Short Term Disability Plan
as 8:2015cv04503
Plaintiff:
Diane Perry
Defendant:
Duke Corporation Short Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dukes v. Smith et al
as 9:2015cv04369
Plaintiff:
Edward Dukes
Defendant:
Wendell Smith and Flanigan and Smith LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
